Does Self-Sabotage Stop You From Succeeding?

Have you ever had the experience where you think you want something badly, yet all your attempts to get it seem to go wrong? Perhaps you’ve set a goal, made it SMART and done all the things you know you ought to do to create well-formed goals, but never quite seem to get it.  I know I have done this many times.

I’ve just been reading a great blog piece by Neroli Makim, posted on Yaro Starak’s site.  It’s well worth reading the full article, but here’s a taste of what she had to say.

‘Approximately 2% of our mind is conscious, and approximately 98% is unconscious. The unconscious is by far the more powerful force that drives our thoughts and actions most of the time, and it’s responsible for a lot of our behavior. John (Assaraf – multi million dollar entrepreneur) has found that in order to achieve our goals, we must have neuro-resonance, that is, our conscious and unconscious minds need to be lined up and resonant. This is when the power of being coherent and consistent in our creative process really kicks in.

One of the big difficulties we face in being coherent and consistent is that our conscious mind will tell us one thing, like “I’d love to be successful in business, I’d love to earn $25,000 in passive income from my blog this quarter.” But our unconscious will be running a completely different story, like, “I’ve got no idea how to do this, I’m freaked out because I’ll have to learn new things and I might mess up and look stupid.”

This kind of thinking will sink our chances of creating that money and experiencing that success quicker than smashing into a giant iceberg. But the problem is, a lot of it is unconscious, we don’t even know it’s going on. It’s a bit like a steady hum of background static, 24/7 in our lives. It’s no wonder the unconscious runs our thinking process that in turn feeds into our actions!’

She has two solutions to the problem.  One, courtesy of John Assaraf is to learn to act in spite of ourselves.  The other, from John De Martini, is to find the biggest reason ‘why this is important’ that you possibly can.  Now both these Johns are men of international renown, and have made a good deal of money along the way. Even so, I think they have both missed a trick or two. NLP (Neuro-linguistic programming) and Hawaiian Huna both have some fabulous techniques for dealing with our unconscious programming, and our fears. No matter how big your reason why, if you still unconsciously believe you don’t deserve to achieve what you want to in life, you will struggle to get your goals.

I’ve been working with NLP and Huna for 12 years now, so I am well-used to using the various processes and techniques on myself.  But when I am really stuck, I find it more effective to get someone else to take me through them.

So if your unconscious beliefs are sabotaging your dreams, check around for an NLP Master Practitioner, or a Huna practitioner, so you can dump the garbage quickly and easily.

Social Networking – Are Outplacement Specialists Missing a Trick?

As someone with an expertise in career coaching, I often visit the websites of outplacement companies. (In case you aren't familiar with the term, according to Wikipedia, 'outplacement is a term used to describe the efforts made by a downsizing company to help its redundant employees through the redundancy transition and help them re-orientate to the job market. To put it simply, they help people who are being laid off or made redundant to find a new job, or even a new career.) In general the sort of advice that most outplacement companies give at the moment centres around good solid real world things like getting your cv up to date, seizing any opportunities for training or retraining, looking at your own strengths and weaknesses, researching the market, targeting who you apply to, using your existing contacts and so on.

Ultimate Life Lessons Launches on Amazon

At last, I am a published author!  Ultimate Life Lessons launches today on Amazon.

Ultimate Life Lessons Launches on Amazon

It’s a collection of tips and lessons from over 30 top entrepreneurs, coaches and philanthropists, including TV’s ‘Secret Millionaires’. In it, you’ll hear what ‘life lesson’ I’ve decided to share with the world on how I got to where I am today. My fellow co-authors have triumphed over huge problems such as near bankruptcy, drink and drugs addiction and still achieved fulfilment and success. My own story has been the journey out of Clinical Depression without the benefit of any assistance from the pharmaceuticals industry (legal or otherwise).

Do you think you could learn something from their experiences? You bet you could!

For the launch period only, we’re offering a whole host of brilliant bonuses, worth thousands. Go to http://www.UltimateLifeLessons.com now & claim all your bonuses for buying our book. You’ll see what ‘Secret Millionaires’ like Seema Sharma, Caroline Marsh, and Gurbaksh Chahal can tell you. And you’ll also hear from success coaches, successful entrepreneurs and other high fliers like Tracy Repchuk, Vinden Grace, Eve Grace-Kelly, Penny Power, Stephanie J Hale, Susanne Jorgensen (Relationships), Kelly Morrisey (Divorce), Curly Martin, Andy Harrington, Debbie Allen, Nick James, and – of course – me!

Career Success isn’t just about making your career work for you, because you are not your career – you’re so much more than that. Ultimate Life Lessons is all about the ‘so much more’.

I’m looking forward to learning how the inspiring collection of business and coaching tips, lessons and insights have helped you to work out what it is you want from life, set your goals and then achieve them.

Here’s to your success!

Do Leadership Models Stop Authenticity?

We are all, in one way or another, leaders.  Whether it’s running your own business, being a role-model for your kids (or other peoples’ kids), being a ‘thought leader’ or a senior manager in an organisation, it’s all leadership.  In recent years, there’s been a call for more authentic leadership, led by Bill George and others.

In the Authentic Leadership model, the leader aspires to be true to themselves and their values, to walk their talk.  Leadership models are generally the antithesis of authenticity.  Yet this doesn’t stop the ‘Leadership’ market from producing new models of  ‘best practice’.

In a recent article produced by researchers at the London School of Economics, one of the key conclusions is that leaders are more successful when they adopt a more participative style:  ‘…while leaders who exhibit a powerful demeanor may boost their appearance of competence, they also risk stifling follower voice precisely because they appear more competent.’

But what happens if your own, authentic style leans more towards command and control?  One of the authors of the LSE report observed that when leaders deliberately try to be more influential, for example by increasing eye contact and thinking about their body language, they often come unstuck.  We have very good inbuilt b/s detectors: we tend to intuitively know when someone is trying to fool us, and we push back against it.

As a coach, I have worked with some really excellent leaders: their people enjoyed working for them, and they got excellent results.  I have also worked with some real ‘one trick ponies’.  People who got results by sheer force of personality, but managed to demotivate their staff, who would have performed even better if the boss had behaved differently.  And there are those who still think that command and control is the order of the day, and don’t even manage to get the results.

Most observers agree that the days of ‘you’ll do what I tell you, and you’ll do it like I tell you, otherwise I’ll…..’ are over, even though there are still some dinosaurs out there.  What they don’t agree on is whether we should apply the more prescriptive models (which don’t agree with each other anyway) or go the authenticity route.

I believe there is a case for a middle ground.  If you read or listen to Bill George, it’s clear that he changed his style over time. He admits that he had to!  He also figured out who he was and became comfortable with his own identity.  In too many models, the concept of knowing who you really are and what you stand for and being comfortable with it doesn’t seem to have much place.

As an individual, you can’t be all things to all people all of the time.  It’s too exhausting.  When leaders really start to understand their strengths and weaknesses, and figure out strategies for dealing with their weaknesses (being honest about what these are is a good start), then they can step into their own power.  It’s what most leaders want to do anyway, if they only knew how.

The less successful ones often go about it the wrong way, either seeing ‘power’ as a game of me versus you, or believing if they deliberately apply every trick in the leadership handbook, they will have people lining up to follow them.

The most comforting thought in all of this, as a recent article in The Director identified, is that leaders are made not born.  You can work at becoming a leader, and ‘those who’ve worked at it have more to offer the modern workplace.’  So if you dream of leading from the top of a great organisation, but secretly wonder if you have what it takes, take cheer. You can still be authentic AND develop the skills to become a successful leader.

Why Society Should Worry About Lay Offs And Redundancy

We all know that when people are laid off, or made redundant, it can be pretty stressful for the individuals concerned.  But it’s all too easy to forget that it’s not just these individuals who are affected.

Some while ago I was talking about this to a coach in the USA.  ‘What is this “made redundant”you are talking about?’ he asked me.  Somewhere in the back of my brain I remembered that the common US expression is ‘being laid off’.  I translated.  He was shocked.  ‘Made redundant! How can you say that about people?  They’re not on the scrap heap!’

No, they are not, but when you are made redundant, it can feel like that.  I’ve been made redundant twice, and the first time I felt terrible, even though I hated the job in question and was actively looking for something different.  The second time, though…that was life-changing, life-affirming and totally brilliant!

When one person is laid off, the effect is generally limited to them, their families and perhaps a few friends and colleagues.  But when a whole group are being made redundant, the situation changes.

For many people, work offers not just a source of income, but a social network.  Colleagues may also be friends, and for some people their colleagues are their family too.  In some industries, these bonds are very tight – as the story of the 33 Chilean miners reminds us.  In others, they are looser, but they are still there.

So when some people are laid off, but others are kept on, there’s a double, or even a treble, whammy.  The individuals are stressed, and anxious about their financial future, their families are stressed, for similar reasons and because the loved one is stressed.  Meantime, people who haven’t been laid off experience a kind of survivor’s guilt, which can also be deeply stressful.  And that stress spills over into the survivors’ families as well…

For the managers who have to deliver the bad news, it is deeply stressful too  It can be a profoundly distressing experience to tell someone that you can’t keep them on, no matter how much you want to, particularly when you have little control in the matter, or  they happen to be friends as well as colleagues  – and so the managers’  families and freidns are affected too.

In organisations where big redundancy programmes are taking place, you often see an increase in overall absenteeism and time spent down the pub or in the bar.  Lunches get longer, working time gets shorter, and only the fear of getting put on the ‘list’ drags the survivors into the work place.  Productivity goes down.  Yet these costs are rarely factored into the costs of a ‘downsizing programme’.  There seems to be an assumption that the survivors will be so grateful they have kept their jobs, they will magically redouble their efforts to make up for the loss of colleagues.

Eventually it turns round, for the survivors at least.  But even for them it can take many months to recover.

So I foresee an increase in stress in our society overall, at least here in UK, and the consequences of that in terms of an increase in stress-related diseases and incidences of anger and anti-social behaviour.  I’ve resisted the general pessimism about the economic downturn, but right now, I have to confess, I do feel pessimistic about how our society is going to react to the latest austerity programme.